This is why the Juvenile Justice Act is a "progressive" one - it not just underlines the need to deliver justice to those below 18 but also talks of following an empathetic, needs-based, reformist approach by all stakeholders while that is being done. This blog post is a story of a field-visit that my NPA squad undertook officially to get sensitized about the issues confronting the enforcement of this act.
We were asked to go to a prominent bus stand of Hyderabad and spot "Visibly Lost Children". Mr. Isidor Phillip, the social worker who helped us understand the importance of the act, defined them as children whose childhoods have been snatched away and they are left to fend for themselves in an alien environment with no meaningful choice to exercise.
So, off we went, dressed in our civil clothes, with vague notions of poor children in our minds, and a hidden desire to enjoy this day that has been freed of evening outdoor sessions. All of us have seen them - almost naked, lonely children - begging on our street lights, or selling barely-useful Chinese plastic-ware, or just taking care of their younger sibling on the side of the road. What we haven't done is to try talking to them. When we did try to talk - we were in for a surprise.
Visibly Lost Children who would run away as soon as we asked personal questions |
After a couple of hours of spotting helpless children, our teams found one child (age around 10 years) working in a restaurant in abysmal conditions and a girl child lost on the bus stand.
I turned my attention to the child labour Hussain, who was apparently sent off by his poor family, living in northern Karnataka as a sort of repayment of his father's debt to the owner of the restaurant. The boy was really shocked and afraid, as any child of his age, surrounded by 10 strangers in a room where a policeman stands guard outside, would be.
A frightened Hussain |
A pic clicked by Hussain |
It was a tough 2 hour deliberation session with the SHO, until he was told about the Govt. Order |
The SHO was in favour of dismissing them there and then. Mr. Isidore Philips had to refer to a govt. order of the same year so as to tell the SHO that Child Welfare Committee (CWC) will be the body to decide upon the two cases. This is the fate of Govt. Orders on the cutting edges of police organisations. When we don't know the law, how can we implement it?
This is where the role of IPS officers becomes important. They can actually make the enforcement meaningful, and once the people get a taste of these much-needed laws, they will begin to demand their enforcement. Until that happens, these officers need to act as change agents. After all, what excuse have we got in not doing the needful here? There will be no political intervention if we take an illegally-employed child labour from a commercial setup and send him home. We dont need extra funds or man-power to do that (especially in the cities where there are umpteen policemen posted in the name of routine protocol duties), all we need is a desire to deliver justice. So rather than waiting for a Supreme Court-driven initiative to reform our entire organisational setup, let us do our bit to deliver better justice while we can with the laws already there with us.
8 comments:
Nice one Rajat!
"what excuse have we got in not doing the needful here?"-->laziness.
Please keep writing!
I have two issues with the article one of them is hypothetical, the other one is more realistic. First, hypothetically if you encounter not an isolated but a full fledged racket involving local politicians whose collective power surpasses your, what would your plan of action be. Silly, but just curious. The second, more important question is, will the sending back of the kid to his parents stop his parents from giving back his kid again from labour. Aren't you just applying a pain killer solution to the tumor of rural indebtedness ? There are some issues in my argument but you get my point right!!!
oh there are some grammatical errors as well .... dammit !!
@anirudh.. Lol! Thts right man.. Infact laziness mite be way up in the list of reasons, m reading upamanyu chatterji jus now and m sure he wud agree
@ashim.. Political intervention doesnt work the way they show in movies..usually if an officer is hell bent on doing the right thing..he can do it.. As of the other point ..u r right in pointing that out..infact that is the reason why the jj act has sought the proactive involvement of the cwc..coz it takes care of the contributing Elements of the problem.. I wud suggest u to pick up the act ..its a bful example of legislative thinking
Have you seen some of Sonia Faleiro's writings? This one: Children Who Sell Themselves is particularly relevant here, and makes for depressing reading.
The fact that he was made to return home against his wishes not once but twice doesn’t perturb Kumar. The activists of the nonprofit must follow their conscience, he believes. But then, so must he.
“When the vegetables run out,” Kumar says. “We eat plain rotis” — an unleavened bread. “And when the rotis run out I will return to work.”
@unknown.. It is indeed depressing...
Bansal regarding the political interveention ... i know and want you to be right but still don't underestimate them .... ok now coming back to the main issue i went through the jj act as well as the child labour (P&R) act .... the problem is again the same .... though the jj act provides for some sponsorship regarding the child's maintenance it does not address the problem of indebtedness, poverty of the parents, as well as the practice of pledging children (which again i think is invalid under the bonded labour (abolition) act) and considering children as collateral or economic wealth .... if you take hussain's case in particular .... the question arises whether he was forced into bonded labour or not .... if yes whether his parents are liable to punishment and this is where we entire into the whole paradigm of a moral dilemma and most of our acts whether it be the JJ, CL(PR) or the bonded labour abolition act fail ....if you follow the BL act to the letter you need to arrest the parents as well his employer (i still need some clarity on this act) .... but once the parents are in jail will it really help the childs restoration ... plus is being legally illiterate and poor and offence .... all these questions baffle me ... there only so much as you as a cop can do and we as citizens will appreciate that but the problem lies much deeper, in the social ethos of our great nation
PS - JJ act is great though implementation as you pointed out is extremely tardy
Okay..People are you sure you still want to talk about political interference. It is like an organ of our body, might be sometimes helpful too. The solutions we can decide upon may sound simple but hard to implement. I feel there should be an independent body who takes care of of whatever happens to these children. We have seen in movies, a child bruised and injured social welfare takes child away from its real parents. Trust me that happens. Yes not practical in India, however, we can have a similar body which will look after each and every child. See, if we can think of computerization of land records and Aadhar like things, why not this? Here, comes in the role of workforce. Somebody said above that workforce is not required. Sir, I would say, do you have any idea of these kind of children roaming on street. Probably when this project is over of your you might not have time for this problem, as an IPS personnel you might have many such problems to tackle. Point is such a body could be under Municipal corporation or in smaller cities under zilla parishads or pancayat smaitis. Yes laws will have to be framed sir. We need policy makers. enforcement everybody to come together on this. If you think we are talking about solving this issue at our level then as Mr. Sahu rightly pointed out we will be giving pain killer not a permanent solution. We require work force, funds, legislation, and enforcement is in your hands....:-)
Post a Comment